Tag cloud from specific profile quota
Design and Skin Customization
Brian would that now only show it from one profile rather than all those in quota 8?
Forum Activity for @garymoncrieff
Design and Skin Customization
Brian would that now only show it from one profile rather than all those in quota 8?
Seamless lists on frontend
Design and Skin Customization
Hey Guys
Before I start this is there anything I should be aware off.
I want to add seamless lists to the frontend of MediaPro, using the same style that skin uses for video and audio.
Creating seamless lists using the default styling is fairly easy but how would go about it in the frontend using custom templates?
And am I wasting my time here, as I currently have filterable categories in all these seperate sections. Is it still possible to do say an genre filter of a seamless audio list?
I also need to use custom templates to format seamless blocks on my community profile index page, so rather than diving straight in, I wanted to check if you guys had any tips on this.
Thanks
updated by @garymoncrieff: 06/19/15 02:15:16AM
One All
Using Jamroom
Hey Guys
Tried setting oneall up last night, went through the instructions for Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn
Sharing to Twitter works fine but the other two give errors as follows
The following errors have been encountered sharing to your networks
facebook 20/04/15 15:28:46 The provider did not accept the message: unknown response received
linkedin 20/04/15 15:28:26 The provider did not accept the message, it is incomplete: The message must contain the node [text->body] and/or both nodes [link->caption] and [link->url]
Is this because my site isnt behind ssl?
updated by @garymoncrieff: 06/17/15 03:52:05PM
Tag cloud from specific profile quota
Design and Skin Customization
Hey Guys
I have been trying to reuse code Micheal gave me in another thread https://www.jamroom.net/the-jamroom-network/forum/my_posts/28969/module-specific-comments to show only tags from a certain profile_quota_id = 8.
{* Tags from all Business Profiles *}
{jrCore_list module="jrProfile" limit="500" search="profile_quota_id = 8" template="null" assign="rows" return_keys="_profile_id"}
{if is_array($rows)}
{foreach $rows as $row}
{$_ids[$row._profile_id] = $row._profile_id}
{/foreach}
{$wanted = implode(',', $_ids)}
{/if}
<div class="title_block border-1px">Tag Cloud</div>
<div class="border-1px block_content">
<div class="item">
{jrTags_cloud height="300" search="_profile_id in $wanted"}
</div>
</div>
But its still returning tags from profiles that are not in quota 8.
Maybe I am way over thinking this however.
updated by @garymoncrieff: 06/28/15 07:59:43PM
Privacy for Under 18s
Suggestions
I was at a network meeting here locally last week about businesses using social media, this is one of the topics that came up from one of the speakers. That is what sparked the idea. There has been a lot of teenage suicides here lately and they are being attributed to online bullying and parents are starting to demand better access to their childrens online activities.
This will effect every community site in the medium to long term and it would be good for Jamroom to lead the way on anti bullying tools built right into the core system.
This is only one idea for privacy, a prevention and monitoring measure but there are other things that can be done also. ie a Report Abuse button, that allows a member to report any item as abusive at the click of a button. Normally anything more complicated and they work take the time.
The last thing I want on my site is a pile of trolls messing it up for everyone.
Privacy for Under 18s
Suggestions
Not sure a new quota will work as I already have multipe quota's and likely to add more. I dont really want to double up on each one as it would become a nightmare.
There must be a way that this could just be added to all quotas. But I guess this would require an update to the core.
Privacy for Under 18s
Suggestions
Yes there would need to be some sort of consent. Your suggestion of two associated users having access to one profile is exactly what I was talking about.
I would invision this workflow
Under 18 signs up, profile made private automcatically by system
Parent is concerned their child is getting bullied so can sign up and request access to their sons/daughters profile.
Consent between parties is agreed.
Admin grants parent access to the profile
Upon the child turning 18, access should be revoked automatically, but of course the parent can re-apply for access after this is there are reasons why they feel son/daughter's account still needs monitoring.
Privacy for Under 18s
Suggestions
It never will but gives people the sense of security, FB works this way for under 13's and while many under 13's are on it, there is no way for their parents to monitor their accounts.
Privacy for Under 18s
Suggestions
No I would be more inclined to make it a required field on signup, and then the system checks to see if the profile age is under 18, if true sets the profile privacy option to private.
But with the growing concern around social network bullying, it would also be nice if a user account could also be associated in some way to another so parents could monitor. Not sure what way that would be achieved however, of if possible.
updated by @garymoncrieff: 05/15/15 03:13:58AM
Privacy for Under 18s
Suggestions
My concern is the ever growing concern of parents and with no abuse system built into Jamroom as of yet, it needs something in this area to ease parents concerns.
