new "performance test" accuracy
Ning To Jamroom
brian:
Jamroom's cache is in the database, so JR is not going to use an HTML drive unless you've symlink'd the jamroom/data/cache directory to your ramdrive - just be very careful you don't run out of space or Jamroom will not function correctly.
Just a recommendation too - the $160 a month Linode plan here:
https://www.linode.com/pricing
with 384G SSD, 8 CPU cores, 16G RAM and 16TB transfer would be an insanely fast platform for Jamroom - seriously. It would be cheaper than what you have now, but would run circles around the performance. Just an FYI. I'm a huge fan of Linode and their platform - I've never been on anything faster for hosting.
soaringeagle:
cache on ramdrive and the front page is large now because of html not being disabled on theforum list
im goinbtg to addthat code later todaty wich should reduce the page size by a 3rd at least
cache on ramdrive and the front page is large now because of html not being disabled on theforum list
im goinbtg to addthat code later todaty wich should reduce the page size by a 3rd at least
Jamroom's cache is in the database, so JR is not going to use an HTML drive unless you've symlink'd the jamroom/data/cache directory to your ramdrive - just be very careful you don't run out of space or Jamroom will not function correctly.
Just a recommendation too - the $160 a month Linode plan here:
https://www.linode.com/pricing
with 384G SSD, 8 CPU cores, 16G RAM and 16TB transfer would be an insanely fast platform for Jamroom - seriously. It would be cheaper than what you have now, but would run circles around the performance. Just an FYI. I'm a huge fan of Linode and their platform - I've never been on anything faster for hosting.
the problem being the drivespace is nowherenear sufficient