Question Regarding Seamless Module Function
Using Jamroom
Ah, I think I see.
Try using height="200px" width="300px" for both the images.
Forum Activity for @ultrajam
Using Jamroom
Ah, I think I see.
Try using height="200px" width="300px" for both the images.
Question Regarding Seamless Module Function
Using Jamroom
Then all you need to do is edit the template to use different html for each module.
Put {debug} into your template to see what variables are available. From memory it's something like $item.seamless_module, so if I've remembered that right you'd need something like this:
{if $item.seamless_module == "jrVideo"}
display it like you want a video to be
{else}
display it like you want a youtube to be
{/if}Question Regarding Seamless Module Function
Using Jamroom
derrickhand300:
WHICH OF COURSE DID NOT WORK AT ALL
Of course the same would need to be repeated for Vimeo
COMBINED INTO SOMETHING LIKE THIS WHICH DIDNT WORK AT ALL
<a href="{$jamroom_url}/{$item.profile_url}/{$murl}/{$item._item_id}/{$item.youtube_title_url}"> <img src="{$item.youtube_artwork_url type="video_image" item_id=$item._item_id size="medium" crop="auto" class="iloutline img_scale" alt=$item.video_title width=false height=false}" alt="{$item.youtube_title|jrCore_entity_string}" class="iloutline img_scale"></a>WHICH OF COURSE DID NOT WORK AT ALL
Of course the same would need to be repeated for Vimeo
You want to break your Vimeo module as well?
As a general rule, you can only have one class and one alt. Html doesn't allow for you writing them twice. You would use smarty to change the attributes depending on the module (jrYouTube/jrVideo/jrVimeo).
Take a look at the seamless module, it already does what you want it to do with combining video lsits.
The Big Reverse of the Web
Off Topic
I don't think the younger generation are really applying will whilst giving up their privacy. To start with, they've grown up in a world of reduced privacy, and we did that to them. They didn't invent or implement current thinking/technology, just picked it up and ran with it (hopefully) from an early age. Privacy is much less of an option for the younger generation than it is for us - and what real option do we oldies have? (us who set it up for these youngsters?).
Quote: People growing up today seem to need someone else or some else's technology to think for them.
We all take the best shortcuts available to us at the time. I use Jamroom (thankfully never ning) and heavily rely on the thinking and experience of the team to inform me on what I need and to give me a head start on how I need to do it. I can trust a whole load of thinking to them, and add my own to make it my own. Excellent shortcut. Most people working websites are still growing up today, however old they are. And they will still be growing up tomorrow unless they are dead in some way.
Beta Launch Page bug?
Installation and Configuration
cool
I'll get that module tomorrow
updated by @ultrajam: 03/12/15 02:05:57PM
Looking for Beta Testers
Archived
I have a module in development, ujQuiz.
It currently allows profiles to create quizzes with multiple choice, multiple answer, "fill in the blanks", "drag to fill connected list buckets" and true/false type questions and works well enough in one site using a custom skin - I'd like to find beta testers to help me make it work perfectly in the main Jamroom skins.
Results are stored in the database and are loaded back into the quiz - you see your results and feedback on the same page after you have submitted your answers. I have more work to do on how to use the answers, so currently it makes quizzes "for fun" a bit like this:
http://www.theguardian.com/travel/quiz/2014/oct/31/us-america-travel-quiz
If this sort of thing interests you, let me know and post below.
I am particularly interested in education users: Sites for schools, students, training, tutorials, or documentation/marketing with a learning element. @Kyle @Michael
There's another module for making learning units / micro sites / workbooks which uses ujQuiz to add formative assessment to the unit, currently in testing.
updated by @ultrajam: 04/13/17 08:24:01AM
Beta Launch Page bug?
Installation and Configuration
Ahhh... Does the beta launch module allow Admin / Profile Admins / standard Users to log in then?
I hope so because if that's the case that is a much better setup than I am using - maintenance mode and temporarily making regular users into Profile Admins for running a demo.
Beta Launch Page bug?
Installation and Configuration
I'm using this at the moment, haven't noticed any problems.
It lets master admin and profile admins through. Standard users are not able to log in.
*** Just to clarify, I'm using the login restrictions in the maintenance notice, not the beta launch module.
updated by @ultrajam: 03/12/15 06:51:23AM
Will a ujGooglemaps map appear in a SiteBuilder panel?
GoogleMaps
I have fixed a bug, but looking at your screenshots it probably won't have been triggered by your profiles - it was only triggered if the first item had no mappable data.
Can you check again that you are using module="jrProfile" NOT module="jrCore" and that the places you are listing are profiles not items.
There is no update yet as there is something else I want to check out before making a new version.
updated by @ultrajam: 03/11/15 03:12:11AM
